HMRC appeals Lineker decision
Several months ago, Gary Lineker celebrated a win over HMRC regarding his tax affairs. However, that was unlikely to be the end of the story. What are the latest developments?
Perhaps unsurprisingly, following HMRC’s loss at the First-tier Tribunal (FTT), it isn’t giving up on its dispute with Gary Lineker (L). It has appealed against the decision made by the First-tier Tribunal in favour of Gary Lineker. The outcome of this case is important for any person considering providing their services through an intermediary where IR35 is in question. The tax involved is around £3.5 million but that’s the tip of the iceberg. Also at stake are fundamental issues regarding the efficacy of the IR35 rules. HMRC’s appeal to the Upper Tribunal was inevitable given that it stands to win even if it loses.
The crux of the dispute is whether the contract for L’s work was between himself alone or on behalf of the partnership with his former wife. If HMRC wins and there’s no appeal from L, it gets the money and may also confirm that the IR35 rules work as intended. Whereas, if it loses it has a case to demand the lost tax from the BBC and BT Sport (although time limits may prevent this) who agree the contracts with L. In case of a loss it’s also likely that the government will act quickly to rewrite the IR35 rules to prevent the loophole uncovered in the FTT. This case is important for both sides and it might yet go to a penalty shoot-out in the Court of Appeal or even the Supreme Court.
Related Topics
-
IHT planning with the family home
You want to take steps to reduce your inheritance tax (IHT) exposure but most of your wealth is tied up in your home. You don’t want to downsize anytime soon so which tax planning options could help you?
-
Deadline to pay Class 1A NIC
-
Supreme Court finds LLP asset managers are not influencers
The Supreme Court has ruled that portfolio managers at a hedge fund did not have significant influence over the affairs of a limited liability partnership (LLP) and as such fell squarely within the salaried members rules. How does this decision impact LLPs across the board?