HMRC wins big in “tax on gifts” case
Bernie Ecclestone’s lawyer faces a massive tax bill following the First-tier Tribunal’s (FTT’s) ruling that sums he received as gifts were income. What made the FTT decide the payments were taxable?
Over a period of 14 years Bernie Ecclestone’s former wife, Slavica, made payments totalling around £37 million to Stephen Mullens, Ecclestone’s lawyer. He claimed these gifts resulted from their "personal relationship of friendship and affection" and that they were wholly outside and distinct from any business relationship. Despite hearing evidence of Mrs Ecclestone’s generosity and a document purporting to be a deed of gift relating to a payment in 2006, the FTT considered all the payments, apart from one, were actually a reward for professional services provided by Mullens.
It is possible for a payment to be a gift, and so not taxable as income, even where a business relationship exists between the payer and the recipient, but the burden of proof is high. Mullen’s case was hindered because neither Bernie Ecclestone nor his former wife gave evidence. The FTT judges said they had no hesitation in deciding that Mullens had acted fraudulently in not declaring the payments and then representing them as gifts.
The FTT also ruled that because of Mullen’s deliberate action to hide the payments HMRC was entitled to make back-assessments under the rules of discovery. These give HMRC more time (up to 20 years) in cases of tax lost because of fraud compared with that lost from carelessness.
Related Topics
-
The tax incentive to do a thorough stock-take
The annual stock-take isn’t exactly your favourite thing to do. You know resources could be better spent elsewhere so you try to get through it as quickly as possible. Why might it be worth a little more of your time?
-
MONTHLY FOCUS: STARTING TO THINK ABOUT VAT
The VAT registration threshold has barely changed over the last decade. As a result, more businesses are having to register. In this Focus, we look at the key considerations for a business that needs to register, or one that may be considering doing so on a voluntary basis.
-
Unused sales suppression tools can still trigger penalties
HMRC has published a new compliance factsheet explaining the penalties that can apply where a business possesses an electronic sales suppression (ESS) tool, even if it has never actually been used to suppress a sale. What do you need to know?