Maximise the benefit of a main residence election
Where multiple properties are used as a home, claiming the correct amount of private residence relief on a sale can be fiddly. Things can be made easier by making a private residence election. How can owners maximise the benefit?

Multiple homes
If a person has more than one property which they occupy as a home at least some of the time, it’s worth considering an election to nominate which counts as their principal private residence (PPR), i.e. their main home, for CGT purposes. In the absence of an election the PPR is determined by where they spend the most time according to the available evidence, but a private residence election to choose their PPR can be made as long as they can demonstrate they use the property as a home.
What is a “residence”?
Remember that mere occupancy is not usually enough to meet HMRC’s criteria for status as a residence. The occupancy must have sufficient quality to constitute a home. A holiday apartment would probably therefore not count, but a residence in the country used at weekends away from a city address probably would.
Time limits and variations
Having established that there are two or more residences (homes), a PPR election can be made. It’s always advisable to make an election to establish one property as a PPR to secure the final nine-month deemed occupancy and to open the possibility of claiming letting relief, if the circumstances are right, in addition to the main private residence relief. Elections must be made within two years of a change in the “combination of residences”, otherwise the opportunity passes.
Once made, a private residence election can be varied at any time by giving notice in writing. It can be backdated for up to two years. For obvious reasons it’s advisable to have the election in favour of the property expected to yield the largest gain, and to vary this to the other property for a short period only, perhaps just before a sale.
Reopening the window
If the two-year window for making an election has passed all is not lost as a new one opens every time there’s a change in the combination of residences. For example, when a further residence is purchased.
A less costly way to reopen an election would be to rent out one of the properties for a short period and then to reoccupy it as a residence. Because the property can’t be used as the owner’s residence while it’s let, the re-occupation counts as a change in combination of residences.
Related Topics
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?
-
How to handle workers aiming to "Slide Away" to an Oasis Concert
The Oasis Live ’25 UK reunion tour starts in Cardiff on 4 July 2025 and concludes in London on 28 September 2025. With ticketless fans keen on obtaining last-minute tickets and ticketed fans eager to get to the gig for when the gates open, this could have an impact on staff productivity and timekeeping. How can you tackle these issues?
-
Is getting your business to pay tax efficient?
You were recently involved in an online discussion about the tax consequences of putting the cost of a celebratory meal for the business owners and staff through the firm’s books. Will doing so save or increase tax overall?