Can a business that hasn't started to trade qualify for a key tax relief?
The First-tier Tribunal recently considered whether entrepreneurs’ relief (ER) (since renamed business asset disposal relief (BADR)) could apply to a disposal of assets by a partnership that hadn’t commenced trading. What was the decision?

Background
In 2014, W, alongside two others, established a general partnership, whose business was to develop, construct and operate renewable power plants at three locations in the UK. The partnership began to undertake pre-trading activities in May 2014.
At a time when the partnership had not commenced trading, it sold two plants to a third party, in August 2015 and November 2015. W reported the disposals on his tax return and claimed entrepreneurs’ relief (ER). HMRC denied the claim. ER has since been renamed business asset disposal relief (BADR), but the same legislation applies.
Points in question
The amount of capital gains in question was not disputed. Rather, the only issue to decide was whether an individual partner was entitled to claim ER on the disposal by a partnership of some or all of its business, when that partnership had not commenced trading.
At the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) in Wardle v HMRC [2021] TC8105, W argued that the disposal constituted a material disposal of business assets. However, and assuming all other conditions were met, the main dispute was whether there was a “business”, defined as anything which is:
- a trade, profession or vocation; and
- conducted on a commercial basis and with a view to the realisation of profits.
The appeal hinged on whether the partnership’s business activities fell within the definition of “a business” for ER purposes, given that they had been disposed of prior to the commencement of trading, when the business was being set up.
The FTT agreed with HMRC. In particular, it noted that the “natural and ordinary” meaning of the definition of “a business” is that it requires that an individual or partnership making the disposal to be disposing of something that is, at that time, a trade, and is conducted, at that time, on a commercial basis. In other words, ER did not extend, in the circumstances of this case, to pre-trading activities.
Applicable points
While W’s appeal was unsuccessful, it’s important to note that it is possible for a company that is pre-trading to claim BADR , where all other relevant conditions are satisfied. This is because s.165A(4) Taxation of Chargeable Gains Act 1992 gives specific mention to pre-trading activities as being within the definition of “trading activities”.
The provision means that sharegolders can potentially claim BADR on a disposal of shares (rather than assets) in a company that has not yet commenced trading.
It will, however, be important not to mistakenly incorporate a partnership shortly before a disposal to try to bring a gain within BADR - the shares will be subject to the two-year holding period. It would be better to ensure at least some commercial activity takes place so a trade exists to remove any doubt.
Related Topics
-
Simpler Recycling rules take effect
New rules on how workplaces must sort their waste and recycling have taken effect from 31 March. What are the key changes to be aware of?
-
New CGT reporting tool
Self-assessment returns aren’t set up for the change in capital gains tax (CGT) rates on the government filing system and will require a manual adjustment for 2024/25 to ensure the correct amount is paid. Why is there a problem and can a new online tool help?
-
MONTHLY FOCUS: THE ENTERPRISE INVESTMENT SCHEME QUALIFYING CONDITIONS
The enterprise investment scheme (EIS) is a generous collection of tax reliefs aimed at encouraging private investment into relatively young companies. In this Focus, we look at the qualifying conditions relating to the investor and the issuing company that must be met in order for a claim for relief to succeed.